Now What?
The AP wire today brought an article that really makes you want to think about our roles and what we do when those roles are defined by the sex that we are born with. In
Now, we may begin to see exactly WHY he had divorced his wife:
Since then, Julia Roach, 55, had a sex change and legally changed her name to Julio Roberto Silverwolf.

Man and Wife??
There is no mention of children in the article, but, the bull-dyke lesbian that changed her sex into a male did so at the tender age of 55, and, possibly, she may have trouble getting a job now. Notwithstanding, the fact that Julia changed her name to Julio Roberto Silverwolf is not going to help her …….hmmm……I mean him, to get a job.

The Happy Bride!
Wait a minute. Since alimony is supposed to get women the means necessary to survive after the evil man divorced her, now that it is a man (technically, I guess) shouldn’t said transvestite be able to work for himself in a man’s world? According to the agreement, that
That stinks.
Something else also stinks about this conundrum. How did Julio afford this rather lengthy and expensive sex-change? I presume she used the funds that
It isn’t legal for one man to marry another. It isn’t legal for a woman to marry another woman. It should not be incumbent for a man to pay alimony to another man, or, by extension, a woman to another woman. That betrays the very meaning behind alimony. The Florida legislature is either going to have to legalize same-sex marriage and change the alimony laws to fit it, or Lawrence needs to be freed from paying alimony to this screwed up human being now named Silverwolf.

Oh, and just for the record,
Oh, and just for the record, that is David Bowie with Mick Jagger.
Nihil est ad omnia parte beatum.
That is
That is funny!!
http://paperclippings.blogspot.com
Oh...and as long as he is
Oh...and as long as he is writing alimony checks they should still go to Julia. He was never married to Julio. If he/she has a problem with that...TOO BAD!!
Man we live in a messed up world!
http://paperclippings.blogspot.com
Well, if he writes his
Well, if he writes his checks to Julia rather than Julio Roberto Silverwolf, then Julio will not be able to cash them, so the same thing is accomlished if he does that.
I am saying that Julio made the decision to become a male, and in doing so abrogated the original intent of the marriage arrangement of man + woman, and therefore all the cards are off the table. If Julia had changed her sex during the marriage, it would have rendered the marriage illegal. The fact that she used her alimony payments to pay for the sex change is particularly heinous, as the alimony money was based on the original marriage agreement.
The fact that the judge is from Florida and ruled in favor of same-sex divorce is just more proof that the US should *invite* Florida to secede from the Union.
Nihil est ad omnia parte beatum.
Actually, "It" will be able
Actually, "It" will be able to cash the checks regardless. I saw it more as a "thumbing his nose at the ex" responce more than anything. The checks are still cashable because legally it is the same person as before. We can all pretend that she is a man now. We can call her Julio and pretend it doesn't bother anyone when she goes into the wrong bathroom. Yet she is still a she, a she with mutilated genitals but a she none the less.
I wonder why we are so eager to have these group delutions like this as a society. That we can have some mercenary doctor go all frankenstein with a patient and we accept that and declare the mentally disturb patient as a different sex now. If we can do that why can't we agree on some of the more useful delusions like, justice, liberty, equality. Nah, thinking an inverted hoohah makes you the oposite sex is the extent of our belief system these days.
"...they should still go to
Now THAT I can agree with.
I am with John, at least in
I am with John, at least in my perception that it was Mick Jagger and someone. The gal didn't have enough teeth to be Bowie.
I also have to agree with Sal. Once a woman always a woman. But James does make a point--so far as she claims to be a man he should be able to disclaim her/hm as his ex.
The problem is that it will open some doors that should stay shut. I won't go into the whole definition of marriage thing as that is another subject altogether.
http://paperclippings.blogspot.com
Oh, it is. I cannot tell you
Oh, it is.
I cannot tell you why that is one of my favorite pictures, except maybe to say that I like it because it is so damn wrong!
Nihil est ad omnia parte beatum.
same as it ever was, same as it ever was, same as it ever was...
In the immortal words of Abraham Lincoln. "It matters not whether my pecker is turned inside out or not, I am still a man".
I can't side with you on this one Phelonius. Mutilation of the human form does not change the essence of that form. A woman can no more become a man than a duck can become a bar of soap. Sure, they both float on water and feel good when you rub them on your skin but.. where was I? Anyway, what is in a name? That which we call a Silverwolf by any other name would still be a seriously fucked up woman.Lawrence picked a winner here and he gets to pay for it. It's one of those life lessons that few of us are unlucky enough to experience. But, in Lawrence's suffering we can all rejoice in the realization that our lives aren't nearly as bad as we thought.
Pic
I thought that was David Bowie and Mick Jagger at first glance.
Post new comment